19 November 2011

The Week

Monday and Tuesday were regular office workdays, and it felt like forever since I’d just been able to have a regular workday. They were very productive days, and Tuesday night I was able to take my children to “Meadowfield Elementary Night” at the Garner’s Ferry Chick-fil-a for some fun with the kids and parents.

On Wednesday, I went to one of the nicest towns in SC, Aiken, for the SCATT (Auditors, Treasurers, and Tax Collectors) fall conference where we discussed what is happening around South Carolina during tax season. I was able to give an impromptu moment to the group on how our Richland County Treasurer’s Office was the first in the state to allow taxpayers to print their own receipts online (www.rcgov.us/treasurer) to complete their business at the SC Department of Motor Vehicles.


Wednesday night I drove back to Columbia, picked up my oldest son, and we drove to Charleston to watch my Citadel Bulldogs get drubbed by Clemson in basketball. We haven’t been able to get to The Citadel this fall with a new baby so it was exciting for us. After the game, we went to Daniel Library where my son decided he wanted to learn the entire history of my school. So, while he finished his super-sized salty pretzel I recounted some of the courageous episodes of The Citadel’s history. We got home late.

Thursday was a return to Aiken for the conference where, in the afternoon as the Co-Chair of the SCATT Legislative Committee, I presented a synopsis of legal changes to the Forfeit Land Commission statute (you don’t want to know). And on Friday, I went back to Aiken to discuss the upcoming legislative session with my co-Chair, Lancaster County Auditor Cheryl Morgan – one of the smartest people in our organization.


On Saturday, I was finally able to spend the day with my wife. The kids went to the grandparents, and we went to Williams-Brice to watch the Carolina/Citadel football game. My Bulldogs acquitted themselves well before falling 41-20, but I was especially happy to be there for the fantastic military appreciation halftime show (complete with a flyover from our own McEntire Airbase) which brought tears to everyone's eyes.

My Clemson Tigers just got destroyed by NC State, but other than that, it has been a great week.

17 November 2011

Passing the buck, again?

This is a story from The Washington Post called "Supercommittee unlikely to reach an agreement," by Montgomery and Helderman. A very brief excerpt reads:

If the congressional “supercommittee” cannot agree on a plan to tame the federal debt by next week’s deadline, as now appears likely, here’s what will happen: nothing.

The automatic spending cuts that were supposed to force the panel to deliver more palatable options would not take effect until January 2013. That leaves lawmakers a full year to devise alternatives.

Read the entire article, here.

12 November 2011

The week & how to help abused children

For two days of this short, four-day week, I had to (tried to) work from home. My daughter got the stomach bug going around at the same time my bride caught a cold.

Though working from home can be very productive when the home is quiet, it is not as easy to do when you’re dodging germs, quieting new baby, and running all the errands. I’m not sure how my wife does it everyday – because I’m sure the way she acted sick is probably a lot like I act on a normal day. Getting back to work full-time was almost easy by comparison.

Of course, the time at home let me watch the drama unfold at Penn State University. And that situation reminded me that we as a society still don’t do enough to protect our children, or to disdain those who abuse them. Children are treated horribly in every community, everyday, and far too often it is hidden away.

It is a tragedy that you can help fix. If you can, prayerfully consider volunteering to help abused and neglected children. Every child saved is a blessing to our society in the future. One of the best organizations in the nation helping protect children is right here in Columbia, Richland County CASA. Click here for more information on how to help.

Clemson Clinches Atlantic



Clemson (Drama) Kings of the Atlantic Division – Williams (TigerIllustrated.com)

04 November 2011

The Week

Sorry for the long post … It has been a busy week. And, out side of Clemson losing, it’s been a pretty good one.

Real estate tax bills were sent out by the Auditor’s Office at the beginning of this week. Though it is always a difficult time for folks to pay their tax bills, this year’s bills for homeowners should have been a pleasant surprise because we were able to give an additional $3 million in credits to the tax bills this year. That means that homeowners’ bills increased from $0-$8 per $100,000 of a property’s value – meaning bills were substantially the same as last year. Hopefully, that is some good news.

Last Saturday I was asked to speak at the Lexington Democratic Party’s monthly meeting, and it was a great crowd at the Tri-City Leisure Center in West Columbia. I spoke on the current political environment in both Washington and at the Statehouse, and the dire need we have for more choices at the ballot box other than the ideologues who currently dominate our policy debates.
*** Of course, during that speech I had to miss my son’s soccer game (the first I missed all year) in which he scored three goals. I asked him if I should miss the next one so he could score a bunch more and he said: “No daddy, I’ll still try to score a goal even if you show up next time.”

On Wednesday I was at a fundraiser for my Citadel classmate, Solicitor Dan Johnson, where I was able to see several old friends and meet some new ones. It would not surprise anyone back during The Citadel days that Dan would succeed (I cannot claim the same for me) and I was happy to support him. I left that fundraiser to fellowship with many more old friends at the annual dinner for the Urban League which had a fantastic attendance to support their efforts in the community and listen to Mayor Steve Benjamin’s speech.

On Thursday, I attended a meeting of the SC Association of Counties Legislative Committee where we reconsidered support for a number of issues for the upcoming legislative session.

And today I was able to go to one of my favorite monthly meetings, the Columbia Luncheon Club, one of the founding groups in the Midlands that brought white and black residents together during the Civil Rights movement. They still meet every month to discuss issues vital to the Midlands under the umbrella of the Chamber of Commerce’s Community Relations Council. It is a group where you feel better every time you leave one of their meetings.

Tomorrow, I will be speaking to the Lower Richland Democratic Breakfast at nine in the morning at the Garner’s Ferry Lizard’s Thicket.

02 November 2011

Bi Partisan group of US Representatives help debt supercommittee – Helderman and Montgomery (Washington Post)

Here is an excerpt of the story:

A group of 40 House Republicans for the first time encouraged Congress’s deficit reduction committee to explore new revenue as part of a broad deal that would make a major dent in the nation’s debt Wednesday, joining 60 Democrats in a rare bipartisan effort to urge the “supercommittee” to reach a big deal that could also include entitlement cuts. …

“To succeed, all options for mandatory and discretionary spending and revenues must be on the table,” the group wrote, adding that previous deficit reduction task forces have suggested a goal of reducing the debt by $4 trillion over the next decade. “Our country needs our honest, bipartisan judgment and our political courage.”

Read the entire story here.

12 October 2011

This time, it really is different – Joe Nocera (NY Times)

An excerpt of the article is below:

"[The New America Foundation’s] paper’s central premise is something I’ve been hearing from [Daniel] Alpert for more than a year now: this time, it really is different. What he and his co-authors mean by that is that the bursting of the debt bubble three years ago was not just a severe example of the ups and downs that are an inevitable part of American capitalism. Rather, it was the ultimate consequence of the modern global economy. Chief among the changes that have taken place is the integration of China, Russia, India and other countries into the global economic mainstream. The developed world once had maybe 500 million workers. Today, say the authors, we’ve added another two billion people to the global work force."

There are several scenarios in this article for how to address the global crisis - none of which, Mr. Nocera admits, have much chance of impacting Washington politicians. But, it is an interesting read.

See the full piece here.

10 October 2011

The case for a third party candidate – Douglas E. Schoen (Politico)

An excerpt from the story is below ...

“…55 percent of respondents in a September Gallup poll said there is a need for a third party. For the first time in Gallup’s history, a majority of Republicans also embraced the idea. In addition, 30 percent of respondents in a September Newsweek survey we conducted, said that a president unaffiliated with either the Democratic or Republican parties would be more effective than a partisan pick in solving America’s problems.

“This is far more than just a reaction against the status quo from an electorate tired of politics as usual.

“Voters desperately want the opportunity to change the political system. Polling showed they are looking for their voices to be heard by electing a centrist alternative to the Democratic and Republican presidential tickets in 2012. They believe, our results show, that this could force the two parties to work together, bringing logical ideas from both.”

Read the full article here.

07 October 2011

Easier Website Coming Soon

A new Richland County Treasurer’s website will go live the second week of November. For a number of months my office has been working with Richland IT to build the most user-friendly website possible. We’re almost there ….

Up until now, our site was useful for accepting tax payments, but it wasn't very user-friendly if you were trying to search for what you needed. A taxpayer was required to physically have their tax bill (and the numbers on it) to access a bill on-line before they could pay. It worked okay, over the past four years around 2,000 tax bills were paid on the Treasurer’s site each month (or about 4% of payments overall) but our new site will allow for an unprecendented ease of use that will allow more people to take find the information they need when they need it.

Next month our new site will make it a whole lot easier to find and pay a tax bill, and it will also let taxpayers print paid tax receipts from the last ten years. Next month you'll see a huge difference in our website that is a benefit to all the people in Richland County. The website will stay the same at www.rcgov.us/treasurer.

A Little Less You Will Have to Pay

Last year, Richland County received more in sales tax than it gave back in tax credits to Richland County taxpayers. When a diligent deputy treasurer of mine noted the difference, we notified the County Council Chair, Administrator, and the County Auditor. To the credit of all involved, it was immediately agreed that the additional funds would be used to increase the tax credits given back to our county taxpayers in the coming year.

The additional $3 million credit will mean that tax bills will be the same or less per $100,000 home in Richland County in the coming year. County Council approved the new tax rates at their meeting Tuesday night (4 October). It will not be a windfall for anyone (from no increase to an $8 decrease per $100,000 home) but every little bit helps when watching out for your money.

05 October 2011

The enemy?

It is hard not to love the music of Hank Williams, Jr. I think I always have. Growing up in South Carolina in the 1980’s it seemed there was always something that related his lyrics to the lives we were living. And, it was fun that he went mainstream American with his, “Are you ready for some football?” each week before a big game.

It is also hard to believe that, with his prolifically checkered past, Hank would be taken seriously as a spokesperson for any political insight. And, I don’t think that his recent rant about President Obama and Hitler should be taken seriously. It should fall away quietly as a tree falling in the forest.

However, there is one thing that sticks with me from his comments, and I just can’t get around it. In his tirade, Ole’ Hank said that the President is “the enemy.” The enemy. That single statement equated the President of the United States to King George, Kaiser Wilhelm, Adolf Hitler, Ho Chi Mihn, and Sadaam Hussein. He said that our elected leader didn’t just have a different view on governing, he said our President was trying to do us harm.

Don’t try to act naïve at this point because we know that it is not just his sentiment, it is what we hear from too many people in America these days. And, this isn’t just a recent phenomenon. Those sentiments were prevalent from the right when Bill Clinton was president and from the left when George W. Bush was president.

Such thoughts aren’t only unseemly, they are what our political system preys upon to drive us farther apart in what should be our only bond ... we are all Americans. We must come together today as we’ve had to in our glorious past to meet our great challenges, but we’re told that anyone who doesn’t agree with us is “the enemy.” Those kinds of thoughts are un-American.

I don’t blame Ole’ Hank for his tirade, but I do blame the media-political culture that has let that kind of thought flourish. The other party is not the enemy, they represent a different point-of-view.

Now is the time for the people in the middle to stake out that ground and say that we won’t stand for the vilification or hatred anymore. It’s time that we say we are proud Americans: no matter who’s in charge.

08 August 2011

It happened anyway

On the brink of another round of financial ruin in our generation's Great Recession, our national leaders finally found a marginal compromise that increased the nation’s debt limit and allowed America to keep paying its bills. To get to the point where our leaders finally did what they should have done all along, they put our people, businesses and financial markets through a disgusting procedural drama. Still, in the end, an agreement was reached, and as deeply flawed the deal was, it was a deal.

A mere three days after the deal was struck for America to pay her bills, one of the major ratings agencies (that determines the safety of all kinds of financial products which, in turn gives those products their value) Standard & Poor’s downgraded our nation’s rating. It is unprecedented.

America has never been below the best AAA-rating, meaning that our nation can borrow money at the lowest possible interest rates, until now. As far as I know, America has still never missed a payment when we owed money (though how we pay for those bills – through borrowing – is a terrible way to do so) and is still regarded as the safest place to invest money.

In the world of government finance, normally a rating agency such as Standard & Poor’s would give a stern warning in the form of a “negative outlook” on the government long before making such a huge decision that could impact every household and economy in the world. Since America had shown we would continue to pay our bills, a new more forceful negative outlook would have served the purpose of showing disdain for our political process without such an enormous impact on the economy.

What is the impact? It can quickly be seen in the fallout in the stock market and markets around the world today. The 600 point drop today resulting from Standard & Poor’s decision impacts everyone (even if you don’t hold any stocks) because almost every government and pension plan nationwide is heavily invested in the Stock Market – meaning they are less solvent and more unstable and more expensive today for the people they serve. If you were expecting higher taxes and fewer benefits from all of this mess, now you just might.

All of this doesn’t even begin to touch on the horrendous performance of the rating agencies themselves, and how much we should trust their judgment. I will leave that critique to this article (click here).

In the end, as I’ve talked about many times before, America’s finances must be managed better by the leaders we send to Washington. There is no doubt that the past months have shown our political process is a mess. Was the downgrade about Tea Party/Republican intransigence? Was it that the President was late to the debate, came in with promise, and then stepped out of the way at the very end? Or was it just a part of our ideologically-driven sensationalist media efforts that have pushed our leaders ever further from real compromise?

I do not know. But, I do know that Standard & Poor’s downgrade of America was a hair-triggered response to our current crisis that could have far-reaching impacts on our pocketbooks for years to come.

26 July 2011

The Twists of the Debate

David Brooks of the NY Times says that President Obama has marginalized himself in the debt limit debate and now Congress has taken over. This comes at the same time that a poll by Ipsos on Monday night says that the American people overwhelmingly are against a debt ceiling plan without some revenue increases to the Federal coffers. According to the poll, 56% want a mix of spending cuts and tax increases while another 12% want a plan with no cuts and only tax increases. 19% want to rely on spending cuts.

See the Brooks article, “Congress in the lead,” here.

See the results of the Ipsos poll in the Politico article, “Debt ceiling poll: Voters with Obama,” here.

16 July 2011

At the Brink

Will lawmakers finally come to realize that they can’t wait any longer? Washington leaders are being pressured by each other, Wall Street, world financial markets, the business community, and regular folks who are all tired of what the partisan dance could do to our economy. If a deal is struck – a real deal that doesn’t just reduce our deficits, but our national debt – then all sides will have to give, or they will prove themselves unable to muster the courage we elected them to display in times of crisis.

Below are several quotes from a story in the Washington Post, read the entire article here.

“I didn’t get elected to punt this problem down the road another six months,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah). “We are the body, we are the commission to make these tough decisions. ... Guys like me are not coming along. We’re not going along just to get along.”

Rep. Allen B. West (R-Fla.) was equally blunt. “The quote-unquote McConnell-Reid plan is no plan. That’s the acquiescence of the responsibilities of our Congress,” he said. “It’s nothing but the typical D.C. two-step, and I’m not going to be part of that.”

Under the stopgap plan, Congress would allow Obama to raise the debt ceiling in three increments totalling $2.5 trillion over the next year. Each time, Congress would vote on a resolution of disapproval, allowing Republicans to blame the increases on Obama. --

11 July 2011

Days of reckoning for us all

I was complaining about deficits at the national level long ago – much like many Americans and many of our leaders. It was something I inherited from a family and extended family that played by the rules and paid our bills, but it also came from my old boss, State Treasurer Grady L. Patterson who passed along his disdain of a huge national debt. He rightly believed for more than five decades that deficits made our country weaker, that we should pay our bills, and that if we didn’t a day of reckoning would come.

That reckoning is now upon us with the potential ruination of our economy if our leaders in Washington can’t come to a conclusion on the debt limit and how our nation will tax and spend.

There are no good outcomes if Washington doesn’t resolve the mess it has created – and the problems that come from this crisis won’t just impact Washington. If our national government can’t pay its bills, it is a certainty that inflation will immediately impact every household and small business in South Carolina – inflation will make buying our necessities more expensive, and it will keep businesses from expanding (adding jobs we desperately need).

This touches all of us.

I was one of those who worried as our deficits, which came under control under President Clinton and a Republican Congress, suddenly exploded after 2001. Our national debt almost doubled from $6 trillion in 2001 to over $11 trillion in 2008 while President Bush was in office. And, in the last two and a half years, during this Great Recession, we’ve now increased our deficit to more than $14.3 trillion.

It was during the collapse of our financial system in 2008 that people began to finally come out of their slumber and question the wisdom of deficit spending. The Tea Parties began to assemble for the common-sense goal of fighting for a government that operated on a balanced budget. The Tea Party demanded that the government pay its bills like everyone else. It was promising that such a movement with only one agenda could make a difference in our government.

Now, I wonder what happened.

On the brink of a compromise to move toward a balanced budget, the newly elected Tea Partiers are being blamed for killing negotiations. It was their single-mindedness to put our fiscal house in order that gave so many people hope that we might get the mess in Washington under control. Is it true these new leaders have exchanged their idealism to score political points? I am not smart enough to know.

I do know that I was unhappy that my Democrats were late to the game of finding ways to balance the budget. I felt that there were many opportunities over the last two years for the President to advance a plan (like the one his own commission published) and President Obama was sadly slow to realize the enormity of the forces around the debate.

Belatedly, the President did join in, though. President Obama has now put everything on the table, including every Democratic sacred cow like Social Security and Medicare. He came to the table ready to compromise surprising everyone. It surprised everyone so much that Republicans, including their Tea Party allies, who would get much of what they want from a budget deal, just walked away from the bargaining table.

Every person who has looked at our national deficit (that wasn’t paid by a special interest group) understands that balancing our budget requires reductions in spending and increases in revenue. We all know things can't remain as they were before the economy collapsed. But suddenly everyone (but the President) Democrats and Republicans alike seem shocked that they might have to give up some of their sacred cows to make this work.

When George Bush (41) and Bill Clinton adjusted the tax codes during a recession (mainly on our wealthiest citizens) it didn’t kill the growth of our national economy. In fact, those actions pulled us out of recession and laid the foundation for the most positive growth in our nation’s history – because they stabilized our federal budget. And they both paid a heavy political price: George Bush lost his re-election, and Bill Clinton lost both houses of congress.

We need that kind of courage in Washington now. Our economy is asking for action and stability in Washington now. The goal is, and should be what the Tea Party first went to Washington to do – to balance our budget. We all know that, to ensure our long-term ability to be a world superpower and ensure our safety and way of life for ourselves and generations to follow, this has to be done now.

We might all have to give a little, but sacrifice and humility were once virtues we admired. Can our leaders sacrifice just enough to keep us from ruinous inflation and come up with a budget deal? Or, will they just point fingers when it all comes crashing down, like they always do?

29 June 2011

Are they ready to blow it up?

Below are selected paragraphs from a story in Politico today.

… Already on the table are more than $1 trillion in discretionary 10-year spending cuts and hundreds of billions more in changes affecting farm subsidies, college aid and retirement benefits for federal workers. Additional savings from health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid are in the offing, as well as a potential $300 billion change in the government’s inflation calculator affecting Social Security benefits and some revenues.

By almost any measure, it is a historic pivot. In the past decade, core domestic appropriations have grown by 9 percent in real dollars, one-fifth of the rate of increase for the Pentagon — not counting the additional expenditures for wars overseas. Republicans made a first dent in April and would now be in a position to follow up — albeit risking a big fight in their own conference over defense cuts. …

… To be sure, introspection has never been a surplus commodity in the Capitol. But it is quite extraordinary now to watch so many well-educated, often well-meaning men and women — held in such collective disregard by the public — remain so convinced of their individual correctness.

Read the entire story, "Debt Ceiling Deal's Ticking Clock Creates Pessimism" here.

24 June 2011

David Stockman: Ben Bernanke is Finished

The Dylan Ratigan show yesterday had an interesting conversation discussing the economy, debt, the bailouts. It is an alternative explanation of the 2008-09 meltdown. Of course, anybody can say what "would have happened" if we had taken an alternate course in those scary days because there is no fear of being wrong. Still, a lot of people at the time (and apparently today) thought letting the economy fall apart would have been a better choice in the long run. Watch it here.

25 May 2011

A Must-See on HBO

You must watch the HBO movie “Too Big to Fail” and if you don’t have HBO, find a way to get it just so you can see this movie. The movie is compelling for anyone interested in public affairs, and terrifying in the clarity that it brings to the 2008 financial collapse that consumed our financial markets and came a hair from ruining our economy.

The jury is still out on the ramifications of the choices made in those days.

Some of the fallout has, over time, shown the actions paid-off: the economy didn’t completely implode (note I said “completely”); banks paid back almost all of the money “loaned” them; GM has repaid their “loan”; and AIG has also had an offering that repaid their bailout.

Still, it is unclear if those actions created a philosophical web that can’t be undone: saddling us with ever-larger financial institutions that are now “too big to fail”; compromising the ideals we hold dear (that you should be rewarded or punished for your actions); and saddling us with a national debt that has become untenable.

The questions raised by the film still haunt us, and will continue to do so for years to come. But, for those who watched as America looked to be crashing before us, "Too Big to Fail" is a rudimentary education in just how serious those times were. Even the people who had the most-dire prognostications at that time may not have seen all of the dangers we faced.

You should watch it.

18 May 2011

I voted for it before I voted against it before I voted for it, maybe

“Stunning” is an overused word in the news. But in this case, I think stunning is an appropriate descriptor for what happened in the SC General Assembly today.

So I begin … In a pretty stunning reversal, the SC House voted overwhelmingly today to extend massive tax breaks to Internet retailer Amazon for a facility in Lexington County, and other rumored facilities around South Carolina at a later date. It was stunning for several reasons including, but not limited to the following:

• the House had just overwhelmingly voted against the same tax package just three weeks ago;
• the Tea Party was watching for flip-floppers closely;
• it was a business investment that benefitted the Midlands which almost never happens (the Midlands has traditionally been left out of economic development by the political power-centers of the Greenville and Charleston areas);
• the Governor trotted out a dog-and-pony show after the last House vote to say the package for Amazon was a bad idea (though she’d originally refused to take a position on the issue)

For several weeks, I was working on several items at the Statehouse and heard the Senate debate the Amazon deal. Though they had to contort themselves to make the logic work, it seemed Senators were overwhelmingly ready to approve the tax package for the Internet giant – and I predict they will, now.

There are only two dramas left to watch – wait, there is one drama and one thing that will never happen to watch now.

The first and only real drama is the bill arriving on the desk of Governor Nikki Haley. Will she or won’t she live up to her promise that she won’t take sides on the Amazon deal, and that she’ll pass whatever comes to her desk? After the House voted several weeks ago to kill the incentives, Haley was saying that was what she had wanted all along. Though she’d voted for an almost identical tax package for TV retailer QVC in 2005, she was happy that the deal hadn’t been approved for Lexington County. Now, she’s given herself some cover on both sides of the issue, but she’ll look disingenuous now no matter what her final decision is.

The second drama that will never play out is fixing the tax code so that South Carolina can be more-than-competitive for future economic development without having to strain common-sense every time jobs are dangled in front of us. South Carolina sales taxes and property taxes have become mush over the last ten years as the General Assembly keeps playing favorites and making our tax code an indefensible mess of ever-larger winners at the expense of losers (the vast majority of South Carolinians).

The drama is what Governor Haley will do - fixing our tax code is a drama that will never play out with the crew in the statehouse.

17 May 2011

Moral Evolution

David Brooks today is one you have to think about. Below are some excerpts ... read it all here.

"Human beings, Haidt argues, are “the giraffes of altruism.” Just as giraffes got long necks to help them survive, humans developed moral minds that help them and their groups succeed. Humans build moral communities out of shared norms, habits, emotions and gods, and then will fight and even sometimes die to defend their communities. …

"But the big upshot is this: For decades, people tried to devise a rigorous “scientific” system to analyze behavior that would be divorced from morality. But if cooperation permeates our nature, then so does morality, and there is no escaping ethics, emotion and religion in our quest to understand who we are and how we got this way."

04 May 2011

Still a dangerous world, but now it is a better one

I am not smart enough to know if the world is now safer than it was on Sunday.

I do remember how I felt that cloudless blue morning as I watched the second plane crash into the World Trade Center while the other building burned beside it from the first impact. I remember the next two days of shell-shocked horror as more and more news rolled-on trying to decipher what had happened. I remember hearing the first plane fly over Columbia days later as I sat at the Statehouse, and I shuddered. I remember wanting payment exacted for the attack on my innocent American brothers and sisters of all races and creeds.

It has been a long ten years. During that time my own religious faith has grown, still I am not very conflicted by the news that Osama Bin Laden has been killed. I am relieved. Maybe I should be conflicted, but I still have a deep-down feeling that his end was better than he deserved.

I do believe in the afterlife, and those who kill unsuspecting children and women and men (i.e. evil cowards) and corrupt others to do the same, have an especially gruesome torment when they are gone. Bin Laden spent at least the last two decades as the cowardly killer of innocent people around the globe.

He is dead. Long live peace and respect for human life, and may America continue to prosecute those who endanger the world’s safety vigorously forever.

29 April 2011

You go first

The biggest kid at the swimming pool just made the little kids jump in first because she was too scared to get in the water. And after the little kids did her bidding, she jumped right in the pool like she’d had the courage to be there all along. She wasn’t afraid of the water and she wasn’t afraid to lead them – she thought going into the pool was a good idea all along – she said.

Yep, Governor Nikki Haley just made a decision on Amazon … only after the South Carolina House of Representatives had already rejected Amazon’s sweetheart tax deal. After weeks of stating she would not lead on the issue, she says the SC House voted the way she’d wanted them to all along (though her Commerce Department was pushing for the deal).

There is an oft-quoted political theory that to be successful a politician should “find out which way the people are going, and get in front of them.” A lot of very good politicians have used this practice at various times (for good and ill) to achieve longevity in the public arena. We are, after all, a representative democracy. But, I don’t remember too many instances where successful “leaders” have demanded that others do all the heavy lifting for them.

It will be interesting to see how this actually plays out. Will the SC House’s decision harm future economic development because South Carolina flip-flopped on this deal? Will those 1200+ jobs not be such a big loss in an economy that eventually improves? As importantly, will this be the be the final straw that forces the Legislature to address our broken tax code so that it becomes fairer and more attractive to new economic investment (without having to contort ourselves into these kind of winner/loser deals in the future)?

Answer to question one: it remains to be seen. Answer to question two: it remains to be seen. Answer to question three: very, very, very doubtful.

For now, we can only say, “Goodbye Amazon, and sorry to the people of Lexington County and the Midlands.”

28 April 2011

Sometimes Satire Says It Best

What John Stewart calls "the government's one, final, *$#@?!% you," to the 9/11 first responders is decidedly sad and hysterical. It is in two parts below.

"Friends without benefits - Part I"

"Friends without benefits - Part II"

Quote of the Day

I won't post quotes regularly, but I found this one too funny to pass up:

“… as a nation, we pride ourselves on our Twittering. America intends to be the world leader in all things twit-related. Soon, there will be a ninth-grade proficiency test on it, and teachers whose classes perform badly will be fired.”

-Gail Collins, NY Times. Read the entire, very funny column called "Department of Good News," HERE.

21 April 2011

Senior Fun Day



Today, (for the eighth year, at least) I was able to spend several hours at "Senior Citizens' Day" at Seawell's on Rosewood Drive. The annual event was started by Bernice Scott and is now continued by her son-in-law, Councilman Kelvin Washington. This year was the biggest crowd yet, as far as we could tell, with more than 800 people in attendance.

I was able to emcee the competition for the best easter bonnet, and there were some doosies - one hat was at least three feet high, and I promise that another contained no fewer than 40 easter eggs, and another was covered in live plants.

Seawell's serves a hot meal while Mrs. Scott and Mr. Washington entertain everyone - but it's not just about the food. There are tons of door prizes and gifts for every attendee all donated by businesses, individuals and community groups who want to help our more "mature" citizens. The seniors all leave with donated items that are essential to their daily life - items of need.

I've also noticed that it has become a reunion for many of the people there, many of whom don't have the opportunity to go to events and get dressed up anymore. For a lot of them, they tell me "Senior Fun Day" is something they look forward to for months.

So, congratulations to all the winners! And, thank you to all of the people who worked so hard to make the day a great success in helping our seniors.

19 April 2011

More Amazon


Today, I was able to make a presentation before a Senate Subcommittee that considered changes to Title XII Chapter 59 of the South Carolina Code of Laws. I was the only one who spoke and was questioned, and it only took about five minutes. Our committee that worked on the changes must have done a good job because the re-codification language we submitted was approved by the subcommittee and will now move up to the full Senate Finance Committee.

Before my hearing was able to begin, the Senate Finance committee debated the Amazon tax package for over an hour and a half. The hearing was marked by pained logic by Senators trying to find a way to bring these jobs to South Carolina – I feel their pain, and Governor Haley apparently does, too, since she refuses to take any side on the breaks that will further fracture our already broken tax system.

The continuing refrain from most of the Senators was that the “retail business model has changed” and, I guess that meant that they had to give some businesses breaks that no one else can be entitled to right now.

I want the jobs, and I would have voted “yes” to bring them to the Midlands. But, we should not even be having this debate in the first place.

The problem isn’t that the economy’s business model has changed – change is a constant in a vibrant economy. The problem is that South Carolina’s “tax model” hasn’t changed with the changing business models. And, the people in charge of it (Columbia’s executive and legislative branches) have no interest in changing how our tax system remains completely stagnant and riddled with give-a-ways – creating too many winners and losers. Our government’s leaders have adamantly refused to address this painful labyrinth of tax oxymorons that has become the South Carolina tax code.

We now have this conversation about Amazon’s investment in South Carolina and the unfair tax treatment they will benefit from. The debate we should be having now is for a fairer, lower, and broader sales tax system. Then there wouldn’t be a need for debates on incentives for individual businesses. Instead, we get another debate about which businesses can best lobby for tax breaks at the expense of everyone else.

We need the jobs, but we need tax sanity to make our state economically competitive even more.

17 April 2011

Waiting for a serious debate

I don't get to say this often, but God bless Robert Samuelson for his most recent column. He's called everybody out for the shallow public relations war now going on in Washington, DC, over the federal debt. This one is going to take a village to fix, but most in the village still think it is the other guy's problem - Samuelson shows that neither plan works.

Again, I think it is progress that everyone is now in the discussion. And, the PR war is inevitable before we can reach a conclusion.

Watch out for the demogogues and ideologues - it will be the leaders behind the scenes in the middle who will finally move us closer to achieving the financial reforms we need.

Read Samuelson's column titled, "What’s missing from the great budget debate: seriousness." HERE.

13 April 2011

All In

Now that President Obama has outlined what he advocates and opposes in efforts to reign in the nation’s runaway deficits, the real discussion begins. After painful months of waiting to see if our leaders would begin to address this mess, now we can debate. As partisan and nasty as it all shapes up to be, this is actually good news.

You can’t have a argument when there is only one side, and you can’t reach an agreement with just one party (or branch of government) participating. Now everyone is on the playing field – they’ve all accepted that our national deficits must be addressed.

I still have a concern that the plans will reduce the deficit (Obama $4 trillion, House Republicans $4.4 trillion) which implies that there still will be deficits, only smaller ones. Not that this development isn’t a positive one, but we need to eliminate deficits and reduce debt.

The national debt stands somewhere around $14 trillion. The debt doubled from $6 trillion to almost $12 trillion from 2001-2009 under President George W. Bush – over a trillion of that was in his final year when the economy disintegrated ($800 billion to banks, billions to Wall Street, $180 billion tax stimulus checks, etc.). Then under President Obama came more bailouts along with falling revenues coupled with increasing spending – more than $2 trillion more.

That means that since the nation was running surpluses in 2001, our national debt has increased 133%, for those keeping score at home. We will have to come to a place where the national debt can be significantly reduced.

Right now it sounds like these folks are talking about cutting up six of their ten credit cards, but still plan to run up the bill on the four they have left.

That is not ideal, and it is not where we ultimately need to end up. But, it is a start. All sides now have proposals with merits and demerits that they will be forced to face in the coming months. Let’s hope that the brawl that is about to erupt will bring us closer to a sane taxing and spending policy – because both must be addressed – to save our great nation.

Obama, to curb deficit, urges cuts and more taxes on the rich – Shear (NY Times)

What Barack Obama said, what he meant – Budoff Brown (Politico)

12 April 2011

The Civil War Anniversary

One hundred fifty years ago today the bloodiest and most destructive episode in American history, The Civil War, formally began with the bombardment of Fort Sumter (by many of our Citadel cadet forebears) in Charleston Harbor. Below, the first two articles are about that fateful day, and the third is a more general comment about the conflict from Ken Burns. Finally, there is a link to The History Channel’s site on this anniversary of The Civil War.

The Defenders – Adam Goodheart (NY Times)

Lt. Harleston Brings On the Brick Dust – Ronald Coddington (NY Times)

A Conflict’s Acoustic Shadows – Ken Burns (NY Times)

History Channel Civil War: 150th Anniversary

05 April 2011

The Balancing Predicament

Here are some excerpts from a Politico.com article today called: Paul Ryan’s proposal poses a predicament for GOP by Burns and Isenstadt. Read the entire article here.

“They’re hanging the 20 vulnerable members out to dry for the sake of placating the 220 safe members who want to save the world and don’t have any other concerns beyond that,” said an adviser to one first-term House member. “You have a couple dozen members who are going to pay a pretty serious price for this vote if they end up in a tough race.”

Envisioning Democratic ads savaging the GOP over Ryan’s plan, the Republican said: “It’s not just cuts to Medicare. It’s ‘Republicans are ending Medicare as we know it.’ That’s not demagoguery. That is the case. This budget ends Medicare as we know it.” …

In the aftermath of a 2010 campaign fought on economic and fiscal issues, Republican officials say anything that keeps the national debate focused on limiting spending will be good for their party. …

The DCCC put out a list Tuesday of several dozen attack ads the GOP and outside conservative groups ran last year, accusing Democrats of cutting half a trillion dollars out of the program through the Affordable Care Act.

In a memo, the House Democrats’ campaign arm recalled that “Republican candidates, the NRCC and their allies ran millions of dollars in campaign ads arguing that ‘massive cuts to Medicare’ were unacceptable.”

Now, the memo continued: “Republicans actually want to end Medicare as we know it.”

Again, you can read the entire article here.

24 March 2011

Columbia's Birthday


Tuesday was an absolutely beautiful day to celebrate the 225th birthday of the City of Columbia. Down on Main Street, several hundred people gathered for music, speeches, and a huge birthday cake.

On Wednesday, the Census confirmed that Columbia was the state's largest city. And, Richland County is now South Carolina's second largest county with 380,000 residents (trailing Greenville by 70,000 and outpacing Charleston by 30,000).

Here's a prayer for our next 225 years!

18 March 2011

And Here We Go, Again

Same old story, different characters - South Carolina has a Governor in some hot-water and a Lieutenant Governor in a lot of hot water. This past week has again been about our officials instead of our solutions. The “talk” coming out of the statehouse has (again) been questions about the ethics of our leaders. And, we certainly should be tired of that in the middle of South Carolina.

New questions have been raised about our Governor’s strange employment relationships and whether or not she has been an honest taxpayer. She's apparently claimed she earned $103,000 more than she claimed on her taxes in 2007. Her history does not serve her well. She has been far from forthcoming about these issues in the past, but I pray she is telling the truth now or this will get uglier for the state before it is all cleared up.

The Lieutenant Governor has been charged on more than one-hundred counts of either withholding information about his campaign account or using it as a personal slush fund for all kinds of expenses not allowed by the SC Ethics Commission. He's also had many ethics violations in his past as a member of the Florence County Council. So far his responses to the investigation have at best been unsatisfactory, and at worst have added fuel-to-the-fire.

Elected service thrives on trust. In most cases, leaders have only been able to make great strides when they have engendered a sense of trust with those they govern. It’s hard to take money or give it out when people don’t have confidence that you are an honest broker on their behalf.

Hope these come to a quick end. If these questions persist about the two highest elected positions in South Carolina, the Legislature will continue to hold sway over every issue (as it has for the last eight years) and our government will continue to be rudderless in dealing with the great dilemmas that face us.

Click here for the site thediscust.com which is offering mugs and cards that say - "Job Security: Make sure the next guy in is worse than you are."

Together We Can Read


I get to read at schools several times a year for many different events. It sounds like something you’re supposed to do or that you have to do, but it really is a lot of fun.

Yesterday, as a part of a collaborative between the City of Columbia and Richland School District One, I went to Brockman Elementary School to read to a class of third graders for the “Together We Can Read” initiative. It is an effort that gets community leaders into every third grade classroom to share a book and answer questions. The children are also given a copy of the book to take home for themselves, and for some of them it is the only book they have at home.

The driving force behind the three-year old project is City Councilwoman Tameika Devine, and I have been lucky to participate for two of the years. The hope of the program is that it will kindle a flame in children that will lead them to lifelong reading and learning.

After reading “Tori Explores South Carolina,” at Brockman Elementary we had a twenty minute free-ranging discussion about South Carolina and what a Treasurer does. I think my favorite question went something like: “How much tax did you make my mommy pay?”

Thank you to Councilwoman Devine, Richland District One, and everyone who made “Together We Can Read” another success. And, look for “Tori Explores South Carolina” by Ashlye Rumph-Geddis, a former School District One student and teacher, for your own children to read.

11 March 2011

The deficits in looking at health care costs

I have never, and may never again, highlight a piece by Paul Krugman of the New York Times. Even though he is thought provoking, his writing is almost always hyper-partisan from a liberal perspective and hyper-partisanship will not lead to the solutions we need now.

Republicans are not always wrong and Democrats are not always wrong. At the very least, the law of averages means they have to be right some of the time. And, those who propose otherwise in our media-political establishment aren’t people we can usually trust for reliable information.

So today though Mr. Krugman continued his rant against the Republican way – and he made the continuing false argument that deficits do not matter much – he also made some interesting points about how we should be directing our health care spending as we dig our way out of this mess (read it here).

Skyrocketing health care costs are the most dangerous spending dilemma facing budget writers at the state and federal level. And, just cutting payments to providers or cutting people off from health programs isn’t a long-term fix, but only a band-aid to get us out of one more budget year. We need leaders who will construct a new, more efficient set of priorities for these programs, so that when government revenues do rise again we don’t fall back into these same old tried-and-failed bottomless and costly policy pits.

10 March 2011

Chasing the Spotlight

A slew of national media attention shone on Governor Scott Walker for taking on the unions in Wisconsin. It was the first big national splash made by a new Governor this year and his actions garnered him the adoration of the conservative movement – and it made some of the other new governors, who styled themselves as reformers, stompin’ mad they were beaten to the punch.

You could almost see it coming. Which state’s Governor would try to catch the spotlight by piggy-backing on the labor issue? California, Michigan, Illinois – or some other troubled state where public unions have had a huge impact on state spending?

Instead, the next Governor to chase the spotlight was none other than our own Gov. Nikki Haley. Even though South Carolina employees have no collective bargaining, and no real union to speak of, and even though they pay significantly more for their benefits than state employees in those places up north, Governor Haley just couldn’t help herself – there was a spotlight out there, and she wasn’t in it.

Though state employees have endured significant layoffs, furloughs, and pay stagnation to help balance the state’s falling budgets – all reasonable responses when there isn’t money in the state’s coffers – the Governor tried to make the argument that our state employees weren’t sharing the burden in our failing economy.

See the article in The State HERE.

The Comet (as Gov. Haley was dubbed by the NY Times) quickly backtracked to state employees and retirees when confronted this week and said that the issue needed to be studied – a simple way of saying she spoke before she was informed. But, she got the headline and can write another chapter in her memoir about her conservative bona fides, and when you’re chasing the spotlight, that’s more important than being right.

09 March 2011

News on the Budget in the Middle

There is some positive news for the folks in the middle about several of our leaders breaking away from their political phalanxes to begin working on the problems of our deficit and debt. Of course, the tone coming out of Washington in general leaves me skeptical, but I will take a sliver of hope any day.

I don't have much time to summarize today, but will try to do so very soon. For now, below is some reading on some of the budget efforts going on in Washington:

Senator Conrad’s Last Gasp – Lloyd Grove (Newsweek)

Republicans Duel Over Possible Tax Hikes – Carrie Budoff Brown (Politico)

A rare bipartisan call to share the pain – Calmes (NY Times)

Freshman Democrat Joe Manchin: Obama has ‘Failed to Lead’ on Budget – (Politico)

Finally Confronting the Debt Crisis – Joe Scarborough (Politico)

07 March 2011

Big Weekend for Local Teams (and sleeping kids)


Bubby was so excited to go to see the Irmo State Championship game versus Ridge View Friday - even though it started an hour after his usual bed time. I played basketball for Irmo Coach Whipple years back, but I was pretty tired Friday night and would've probably stayed home if my little guy hadn't been so insistent on going to see "daddy's team".

We made it to the Arena in time to see the Spring Valley girls get some revenge and win their championship (congratulations!). Then, as you would've guessed, Bubby fell asleep ten minutes before the boys' game started and he didn't wake up until I was carrying him back to the car (we'd parked a half mile away - and I've got to say five-year-olds get really heavy after a while).

Congratulations to all the winners this weekend, but especially to all the folks in the Midlands who brought home championships. Sorry if we slept through it!

04 March 2011

We have PLENTY of time for this irrelevant stuff

In her first opportunity to grace us with a breath of fresh air at the State of the State address, Governor Haley proposed cuts totaling $13 million to try to close a $700 million budget hole. Not much in the way of leadership or accountability there, but it was just a first try, so give her some slack.

But this week the Governor has struck forth again with a new initiative – she will grade lawmakers based on her criteria and her judgment. The whole concept is really kind of funny. Especially since her judgment has had a lot of errors in the past.

The Legislature has so many problems that include transparency, accountability – you name it, they got it. Some of the reforms on the list really should happen (the House already approved some of them when Sanford was still around). Still, it would seem that someone who had walked-the-walk would be the one who could shame the Legislature into doing what it should. Instead, we’ve got the equivalent of a drunk driver setting up the DUI checkpoint. I can see legislators now, “she did it and became Governor, so why can’t I?”

Though the four issues the Governor will grade won’t save the state money, nor create a job, they have the benefit of being extremely dull. Combining some state functions here, and adding to transparency and disclosure there … are you asleep yet?

And, now she wants to use these irrelevant hot-milk issues to show the state she’s got some pull. I suppose that acting like their school principal will get the statehouse to straighten up and be happy to work with her. It worked for her predecessor, right?

See THE STATE newspaper's story here.

03 March 2011

You Can't Escape

Politics is bleeding more and more into everything we do, and that is not always a good thing. In fact, it is rarely a good thing because of the way politics is being practiced today. Folks in the middle understand that just because someone doesn’t agree with our position, they’re not a bad person – yet, the political rhetoric in the media-sphere says just the opposite.

On my way to work this morning, I listened to the ‘Mike and Mike’ show on ESPN radio for about ten minutes. I don’t know if the topic of unions dominated the conversation any longer than the ten minutes I was listening, but what I heard was a disturbingly angry translation of political talking-points into the NFL negotiations that are being held now. The talk was tinged by what is happening in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states. It was just plain odd (or maybe it was just me?).

Watch out! Until we get some adults leading the discussion, we’re not going to have adult conversations about anything.

01 March 2011

Cutting with a scalpel or a mallet?

For all of the talk about zero-based budgeting that has made the politicians’ talking points in recent years, have you every seen anyone actually do the work? Have you seen anyone who even attempted it? Has in-depth evaluation of government programs been just another ruse to get votes? So far, these folks have been all talk and no show.

Now, in the third year of this ‘great recession’ – the third year of deep cuts at the state government level – you would think that there might be a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis showing where our tax-dollars have the greatest impact. Maybe now would be the time that some of these folks put their theories into practice?

Nope.

It is the time for something different. I’ve never liked zero-based budgeting because it was always just oversimplified talking points (and it previously failed when the US Air Force tried to implement it). But we need some effort to better direct the huge state cuts this year and, most importantly, how to direct the inevitable economic growth that will come in the future.

There should be a top-down programmatic review of what state government does. What is done well and poorly? What overlaps with other functions? Who can most efficiently deliver certain services? What can be privatized and what cannot? What are the priorities?

Right now, it looks like another year will pass before someone will do the heavy-lifting required at the Statehouse. But, if we don't do something different we will be unable to build a stronger future from the ashes of this great recession.

23 February 2011

It Takes Us All To Fix What Ails Us

One of the most ridiculous themes that come from the political parties today is that if we just do it their way everything will come up roses. Republicans will tell you that strategic spending cuts can balance the budget, but it won't. Democrats will tell you that repealing specific tax cuts will close the deficit and balance the budget, but that isn't enough either.

It is readily apparent that everyone is positioning themselves for the next election (as they always do) instead of attempting to fix the crisis that faces us all. But, what faces America, and South Carolina, now doesn't fit into the soundbites or the political ideologies we've been accustomed to and have become comfortable with in the past.

We are in a place where what government spends (your programs) and the revenue it generates (your taxes) must be fundamentally and systematically revised. Both are required to fix this problem. Any leader who proposes a solution to our problems that doesn't incorporate both isn't going to fix anything at all.

The folks in the most high-profile positions just aren't ready to be honest with the people in the middle about what shared sacrifice, and shared success will mean to our state and nation in the future.

David Brooks had a great article this week called "Make Everybody Hurt" - read it HERE.

18 February 2011

Mr. Budget in the Middle?

Congressman John Spratt was one of the few people who understood the Federal Budget inside and out. I first met him in 1996 and he is a fantastic human being and public servant. And, South Carolina lost a lot of clout - very valuable clout - when he lost his election this past November.

But, in the spirit of folks in the middle, I've taken a great interest in his successor. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis) was given the chairmanship of the powerful House Budget Committee when Republicans took control of the US House in November.

Ryan makes everybody nervous, Republicans and Democrats alike. He was a debt-hawk long before it became sexy to politicians - several years ago he published "A ROADMAP FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE" to fix the long-term national financial problems. He speaks his version of the truth. I like those characteristics in anyone who isn’t crazy, and he isn’t.

I cannot say I agree or disagree with his approaches (I just don't know enough about all of his proposals) but I like that he's trying to fix the problems we face.

HERE IS AN INTERVIEW WITH REP. PAUL RYAN from "Morning Joe" earlier this week.

17 February 2011

Federal Budget Tales

I'm in meetings all day looking at cleaning up the South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 12 (property tax laws) with a number of Treasurers, Auditors and Tax Collectors from around the state. It is about as fun as it sounds - and, no, these meetings aren't dealing with how much people pay in property tax (sorry).

There were three stories I wanted to share about the coming federal budget battles, even though I don't have time to comment on them today.

-- Obama budget plans shows interest owed on the national debt quadrupling in the next decade (Washington Post)

-- Paul Ryan vows to target Medicaid and Medicare (Politico)

-- Austerity Lite (Economist)

16 February 2011

How Close is America to a Fiscal Crisis?

Here is a story in THE ECONOMIST with comments from a bunch of economists on our national financial crisis:

"The Congressional Budget Office projects that America's 2011 deficit will be $1.5 trillion, or 9.8% of GDP, and debt held by the public in the 2011 fiscal year will approach 70% of GDP. How close is America to facing a bond market crisis? Should drastic cuts to the budget be made now? Over what horizon should they extend? And what balance between tax increases and spending cuts should be struck?

"Or is the entire underlying premise of the question mistaken? Can America count on a return to growth to solve most of its near-term budget problems? And how should other economies approach America's fiscal morass?"

Read the entire article HERE.

11 February 2011

The Freedom Alliance by David Brooks

This editorial about the Fiscal Crisis that faces the federal government today is excellent. Below is an excerpt:

“Over the next few weeks, Republicans will try to cut discretionary spending to 2008 levels and tell their constituents they are boldly reducing the size of government. That is a mirage. Anybody who doesn’t take on entitlement spending is an enabler of big government. The supposedly rabid Republican freshmen are actually big government conservatives. They will cut programs that do measurable good while doing little to solve our long-range fiscal crisis.

“Meanwhile, the Obama administration theoretically opposes runaway debt while it operationally expands it. The president is unwilling to ask for shared sacrifice if the Republicans won’t ask with him. Fine. But he hasn’t even used his pulpit to prepare the ground. He announces unserious cuts with lavish fanfare.“


Read the entire article HERE.

10 February 2011

Are You Ready to Be a Leader?

It takes the bravest person to place their name on a ballot for all of their community to scrutinize them. I know, I've done it three times. In politics there is the dirt, the lies, the endless hours of work, and the uncertainty that you will ever succeed. Public service is not a timid lifestyle. In fact, it is the most difficult and the most rewarding of professions, and I believe that you should step forward – now.

In the book An Unfinished Life, author Robert Dallek quotes John F. Kennedy’s zest for public service on page 120. “Everything now depends on what the government decides. Therefore if you are interested, if you want to participate, if you feel strongly about any public question … it seems to me that governmental service is the way to translate this interest into action.”

If you go into finance, those are the only issues you deal with. Go into education, and you are in that box. If you are in insurance, sales, real estate, etc., those are the only places that you have the opportunity to excel.

But, public service gives you the opportunity to not only test your mettle, but to see a wider world, and how interconnected we all truly are.

South Carolina more than ever needs our best and brightest – and youngest – to make public service one of the goals that they strive for. Why?

Now is the time for hard choices, for new leaders that can sometimes set aside ideology to work together for the greater good. We’re in a mess that was created by both Republicans and Democrats. Yet, we continue to get spoon-fed the same talking points that have failed us for almost two generations – lower taxes and new spending programs have been tried and failed. As a nation, we doubled our national debt from 2001-2009 (under a Republican) and that public debt is now increasing (under a Democrat). We are facing the greatest crisis in eighty years, and no one seems able to come up with any new solutions.

What’s missing? Young leaders. We need young leaders who still have the hope of surprising us – men and women who will put their name on the ballot, win, and then eschew the old party and media driven ideologues to work together to fix a system broken by years of playing favorites.

Are you ready? Do you have the courage to be a leader “in the middle” to help us fix this?

08 February 2011

A Historic Shift in the South

This past Sunday, The State newspaper ran a story about South Carolina's vanishing white Democrats (read HERE). Today, I found a video history of the political shift in the South on The Economist website (see HERE).

The loss of the differing views within each political party is hurting us all. It leaves us with an inability to have a pragmatic, moderate government. When one party has too much power, the pendulum inevitably swings too far to the right or left - as we've endured for much of the last 11 years.

Maybe we have never had a moderate government, but it is a certainty that we do not have a government in the middle now.

07 February 2011

Government Makes You Eat Vegetables

As often happens when the stakes are high, the threads of each argument get tugged on, and sometimes the argument falls apart. In the case of Health Care Coverage and Judge Roger Vinson (the Florida Judge who struck down the law) a lot of very smart people are parsing his every word. And, apparently at The Economist, they found where Judge Vinson made an unfortunate comparison.

Read "The Government Does In Fact Force You To Buy Vegetables," here.

03 February 2011

Governor Moonbeam in the Middle?

I usually like to first read commentators who can write with some sarcasm and humor. Yesterday someone sent me a story from Ruth Marcus in The Washington Post – who doesn’t often fit in those categories. And, though it didn’t fit what I normally like, it did fit into what I like to read most about: leaders showing some backbone to address real problems by moving into the middle.

This story was also somewhat surprising in that it showed Governor Jerry Brown of California, a traditional liberal, making a State of the State address that challenged the parties to eschew some of their sacred cows to fix California’s problems. Of all of the Governors elected last November with the hope of adding new approaches to old problems, Gov. Brown was probably not on the list of bi-partisan problem-solvers. In this speech, it looks like he must have decided that reality trumped ideology.

Ruth Marcus also did a fantastic job of contrasting what the Governor of California charged his government to do with how the President handled the State of the Union. You can read the commentary HERE.

In South Carolina, we certainly could use some leadership from the middle that gives us real solutions instead of the same old campaign rhetoric.

02 February 2011

Having Fun at the Expense of Partisans

One of the biggest gripes of the people caught between the right and the left - those of us in the middle - is that the partisans just refuse to work with one another to solve a problem. Someone has to win, and someone has to lose, and there can be no shared credit in this political climate.

But, you can have some fun with the way things are.

The Onion is one of the best-in-the-business at satirical swipes at the political establishment, and the current atmosphere in Washington is the perfect fodder. Will those folks up there ever see eye-to-eye on a common problem bearing down on us?

Not according to THIS article.

Clowney Puts Clemson in Mix, and USC Loses Sleep

Jadeveon Clowney set the radio shows in Columbia on fire today during an ESPN interview when he put Clemson in his top three of where he might play college football. He still spoke highly of the Gamecocks, but previously it had been a two team race between USC and Alabama for his services. When he added Clemson to the list, you could feel the Gamecock melt-down that their most-hated rival could have a shot at the consensus number one player in the country.

Though he's still likely to end up in Columbia when he makes his choice on February 14th, the Rock Hill Defensive End just added a lot of sleepless nights to Carolina fans and added a lot of fodder to the radio hotlines for the next two weeks.

See the 5 minute video HERE.

27 January 2011

Don't Look for Washington to do Heavy Lifting

In a harsh profile of the political environment surrounding the gargantuan federal deficit, this article from The Economist says what we already knew: neither political party looks willing to do the heavy lifting it requires to balance the budget and reduce the debt. The article belittles both parties’ budget plans for the coming year, and the negligible impact that those plans would have on the country's budget.

Democrats won’t discuss the necessary spending cuts and Republican won’t discuss raising the necessary revenue. Both will have to be a part of the solution, but no one looks willing to meet in the middle, yet. Surprised?

Read THE UNION’S TROUBLED STATE, here.

Old Hickory: All Things To All People in 1861

I've always perked-up a little when people invoke President Andrew Jackson. He was such a contradictory and controverial figure that you can place him on almost any side of any situation. Last year, my wife bought me John Meacham's American Lion which is a pretty short biography of Jackson - which, like most of Meacham's books, is an easy read if you like history.

I saw the article called OLD HICKORY'S GHOST this morning in a special series that the NY TIMES is running to commemorate the 150th year of the beginning of the Civil War. Hope you find it informative.

25 January 2011

How Would You Fix South Carolina's Budget?

Below is a link to THE STATE which, several weeks ago, put together an interactive site for people to try to find the $830 million in cuts/revenue it will require to balance South Carolina's budget this coming year.

It doesn't give the detail you might need to make all of your choices, but it is a good exercise to see just how big the problems are that we face this year.

When there's no money to spend, and no one is willing to tackle how the Statehouse has decimated the tax structure in the past two decades, then State programs will have to change dramatically or be eliminated all together.

If no one is willing to meet in the middle, I can only suggest that you hold on, it will be a long year.

To try it out, click here: How would you fix South Carolina’s Budget?

The Administration of the New Economy

David Brooks continues his arguements for the role of government in the economy of the 21st century. Read THE TALENT MAGNET from today's NY Times.

24 January 2011

Revisiting Ike's Farewell

While America is focusing on the 50th Anniversary of President Kennedy's inauguration, Dr. Bacevich reminds us of one of the most important farewell speeches of the 20th century. Here is a reflection on Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell speech as president, and how some of his predictions have fared in the past fifty years.

Read The Tyranny of Defense, Inc., here.

State Bankruptcy is a Bad Idea

On Saturday, a couple of days after the news broke that leaders in Washington were looking into allowing states to file for bankruptcy, this piece was published in the Wall Street Journal: State Bankruptcy is a Bad Idea.

21 January 2011

Planned for Your Retirement?

So, if you’ve been hiding your head in the sand and still believe that somehow you’ll receive Social Security or state retirement benefits (for those of you under 45) new proof is here that you might want to begin planning for an alternative.

It appears that Congress is working on another bailout, but this time instead of spending money, they are looking for ways to wave a magic wand and make states’ debt disappear. How? Looks like Congressional leaders want states to be able to declare bankruptcy and allow them to be protected from paying the pensions they’ve promised their government employees.

Welcome to the new world of making bad choices and then just having the consequences vacated by the Federal Government. Banks got bailed out by President Bush. Car companies got bailed out by President Obama.

Now, will states get to abdicate their responsibility for bad choices, not making difficult decisions, and will these state employees unions (in other states) get caught by their unwillingness to work with their governments to help fix the problem?

South Carolina is not nearly in the dire straits of some of these states, but the warning signs are there. Keep an eye on your pocketbook, their promises, and our future.

Very good article on these new bailout machinations behind the scenes, here.

20 January 2011

State of the State Address

Governor Haley’s State of the State speech last night [summarized]:
“I love South Carolina. We have tough days ahead. I won’t talk about any specifics but I will give you pablum for forty minutes (except for a couple of things that don’t really impact the budget at all). But let me leave you with this, you need to make some hard choices in the Legislature and I will support you … maybe. I love South Carolina!”

We need a lot of courage in a leader in the coming year where it looks like nothing but bad choices face us in the Statehouse. There weren’t any answers delivered last night about what we should expect in the coming year.

As a State-of-the-State speech, the effort rates a “C-“. Though there were no specifics, and several contradictions, at least there were many nicely phrased generalities that were delivered well.

We need a lot from this Governor’s Office, so let’s not count her out before she’s started. I will hold out hope that the Governor will be a lot better at governing than she was in this speech.

19 January 2011

Opening Note

I am a proud American – no matter who’s in charge. No matter how much I agree or disagree with what is happening in the world around us, I know that this community and our nation are too good to be compromised by bad people or bad leaders. Collectively, America can always overcome.

America is not a nation of Rush Limbaugh’s, Chris Matthews’, Keith Olbermann’s, Glenn Beck’s, Rachel Maddow’s or Bill O’Reilly’s. We are a nation sitting around kitchen tables, looking at shrinking bank accounts and investments and ‘help wanted ads’ and wondering why government can’t fix that pothole, why they can’t catch that drug dealer, why children are in classrooms with 35 kids, and why we can’t afford a college education or retirement.

Getting things done has become harder and harder as the political parties are being driven farther apart by the media-political establishment. We need new leaders, but new leaders are not enough – we need a new spirit in our leaders – leaders who have the courage to get things done (sometimes) despite their ideology.

Running government successfully is largely a non-partisan endeavor – you either provide enough military security, police and firefighters, teachers, good roads, effective court systems, protect the environment and develop the economy, or you don’t do those things. People who get elected to do anything other than run government efficiently and effectively will not run government efficiently and effectively.

I will try to keep my comments short, and on several specific items that most folks in the middle can agree upon: safety and security, education, environment, and fiscal responsibility. There are basics we should focus on together, things we can fight for and pay for, and I hope that I can stay focused on them with you in the months to come.